JACOB DID NOT WAIT FOR 7 OR 14 YEARS BEFORE LEAH/ RACHEL WERE GIVEN TO HIM. HE TOOK BOTH WIVES IMMEDIATELY.

-

Many Christians thought that Jacob worked seven years for Laban, realized that Laban deceived him to marry Leah, and then worked seven more years before finally getting married to Rachel. However the bible shows that he took both Leah and Rachel immediately before he began serving Laban.

For clarity, I advise you to read this Jacob's story in other translations of the Bible aside King James Version (KJV). Meanwhile lets look at look at some of the facts from the Bible:

(Genesis 29:21 KJV) And Jacob said unto Laban, Give me my wife, for my days are fulfilled, that I may go in unto her.

Please note that the 7 years of service required of Jacob were the total dowry and not the customary waiting period before a wife was given to the groom. In other words, Jacob took Leah after the customary waiting period which was a couple of days just like we read in vs 21.

Notice that he said, "Give me my wife, for my days are fulfilled" implying a certain number of days from the time the marriage contract was made until he could actually have the bride. He did not say,  "Give me my wife, for my years are fulfilled".

(Genesis 29:27 KJV) Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.

(Genesis 29:28 KJV) And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.

(Genesis 29:29 KJV) And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.

(Genesis 29:30 KJV) And he went in also unto Rachel, and he loved also Rachel more than Leah, and served with him yet seven other years.

From the above verses we learn that Jacob received both wives within a week of each other. Since it can be proved in vs 21 that Leah became his wife at the beginning of the total 14-year dowry period after the customary waiting period, then we know that Rachel became his wife also at that time.

More so, in consideration of the period required by Jacob to give birth to so many children, it will be unreasonable to believe that Leah's 7 children and all the children of the maids and Rachel were born within 7 years (i.e at the end of the first 7- year period) as some people thought. The last son of Jacob before returning to Canaan was Joseph, born the 14th year of his father's 20 years stay in Haran. At his birth Jacob desired to return to Canaan, but was persuaded to remain 6 more years (Genesis 30:24-28; 31:41)

Comments

  1. Unknown24/10/18 4:40 pm

    This is very informative.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown15/1/22 4:44 am

    Verse 25. Said did not I serve you for Rachel. I understand that Jocab serve seven for Leah, but Rachel was given him before he serve another seven year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chuks Destiny15/1/22 9:07 am

      If we are to have harmony regarding all the facts in the Scripture, both wives would have to have been given to him at the beginning of the total 14 years dowry period as I earlier stated. In Vs 21 he said to Laban, Give me my wife, for my days (not years) are fulfilled. Implying a certain number of days from the time the contract was made until he could actually have his wife. It could not have been 7 years of waiting to fulfill the marriage contract. These years of service was the total dowry and not the customary waiting period. More so, to believe that Jacob received Leah at the end of the first 7-year period would not give enough time for so many children to be born. It would have been impossible to account for Leah's 7 children and a 2-year unfruitful period in 7 years.

      Delete
    2. Chuks Destiny15/1/22 10:34 am

      More so, Judah (the fourth son of Leah) could not have been born in the second 7-years, for the events of Genesis chapter 38 related to his life and was supposed to have taken place before his family went down into Egypt. This requires more time.

      Delete
    3. Chuks Destiny15/1/22 12:29 pm

      Vs 25 indeed seems confusing. However, read Gen 30:26. It also seems to suggest that even Leah was not given to him until after the 14 years service. But that's not the case as Leah had already given birth to children.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous25/5/22 5:38 pm

    I disagree. Gen. 29:20 says, "And Jacob served seven years for Rachel; and they seemed but a few days, for the love he had to her."
    Vs. 21: "And Jacob said unto Laban, give me my wife, for my days are fulfilled, that I may go in unto her."
    Laban then gathers all the men of the place together, makes a feast, and gives Leah to Jacob (vs. 22,23).
    Now, the next morning Jacob discovers it's Leah and not his beloved Rachael, then confronts Laban about it. Laban ends up telling Jacob to "Fulfill her (Leah's) week, and we will give thee this also for the service thou shalt (future tense) serve with me seven other (agreeing with vs. 20 that he had already served seven years) years."
    Vs. 28: "And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also."
    He served seven years and got Leah, then spent a week with Leah, then Laban "gave him Rachel
    his daughter to wife also." (vs 28). Then, he worked off seven more years for Rachel.
    He worked a total of 14 years for Rachel, but got her after he worked 7 years and 7 days. The last 7 he worked off after the wedding!
    We must be very careful to read scripture in its context so we don't try to make it say something it doesn't. Sometimes it's a matter of understanding plain grammar--

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous24/7/22 3:02 pm

      This seems to be the best handling of the text. I wish someone would attempt to explain why in the world he offered seven years of service in the first place, as any commentators I have access to fail to dig into that issue.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2/2/23 5:05 pm

      It’s likely that Leah simply wasn’t at marriageable age yet, but probably not the whole 7 years shy. Jacob’s thought process may have been that Laban would allow the marriage a few years into the deal after seeing how good of a worker Jacob was, and that he would be faithful in fulfilling the remainder of his agreement even if Laban gave Rachel a couple years early. Jacob may also have been a little impetuous, such as when someone makes an impulse purchase without considering their budget first, or committing to an event before consulting with their spouse. There are many reasonable explanations for this story. I often wish the Bible gave us more definitive answers to some of these very good questions.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEING CLEANSED AND BEING MADE WHOLE?

-
Image
Many Christians believe that the word translated “whole” in Luke 17:19 KJV refers to both physical and spiritual healing and that the nine lepers  in the chapter received only physical healing because they did not return to give thanks to Jesus where as the leper that returned to give thanks to Jesus received both physical and spiritual healing. They believe all the lepers were cleansed but the one that returned to Jesus got something extra which is that he was made whole (i.e his limbs which may have been lost or deformed as a result of the leprosy were restored or that he got salvation for his soul). Though this may be true, there's however a more likely possibility that the leper did not get something more than the rest of the nine. Let's first read the story: (Luke 17:12-19 KJV) And as he entered into a certain village, there met him ten men that were lepers, which stood afar off: And they lifted up their voices, and said, Jesus, Master, have mercy on us. And when h
Read more

DID GOD REGRET CREATING MAN IN GENESIS 6:6?

-
Image
Genesis 6:6 is one of those difficult verses in the bible of which different bible commentators have varied interpretations. The verse seems to suggest that God regretted His action of creating man on earth. But how can one attribute regret to the All-Knowing God?  Genesis 6:6 (ESV) And the LORD regretted that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart.  Genesis 6:6 (KJV) And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.  Genesis 6:6 (NASB) The LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart.  The Hebrew word translated as “ regretted ” or " repented"  or " sorry"  in the above verse is yin'nā'hem , from the root word nacham . The word is exclusively about emotions: a feeling of pain, sadness, or unhappiness. The word does not imply that God feels He has made a mistake, or that He wishes to have done differently .  However, this word sim
Read more

“IT IS A SIN TO PAY OR RECEIVE TITHES” — PASTOR CHRIS OJIGBANI

-
For hundreds of years, Christians incur the wrath of God by paying and receiving tithe. Though the doctrine of tithe is popular and generally accepted in Christianity, it’s a wrong doctrine. It’s actually a sin to pay tithe and it’s equally a sin to receive tithe in Christianity. The doctrine is generally accepted because of the misinterpretation of some tithe related scriptures. A misinterpretation of a scripture can lead many generations astray. In like manner, the misinterpretation of tithe related scriptures has led many Christian generations astray. Before explaining the true meaning of the scriptures, it’s important I first explain what tithe means. What is tithe? Tithe as an English word means one tenth or 10 percent. Tithe in the scripture means a mandatory 10 percent of one’s increase (Deuteronomy 14:22). How often did Israelites give Tithe? The tithe system had a seven-year cycle. The Israelites were mandated to give tithe on the first year, second year,
Read more

IS THE RAPTURE BIBLICAL PART 2: WHY WOULD THE SAINTS RISE TO MEET CHRIST IN THE AIR, WHEN HE IS ON HIS WAY TO THE EARTH?

-
Image
This is a continuation of my previous post " Is The Rapture Biblical " Why would the saints rise to meet Christ in the air, when He is on His way to the earth to defeat evil and to establish the Kingdom of God here? Why not simply wait for Him to arrive? Those who teach the rapture make much of this issue, claiming that it buttresses their theory. In fact, the truth of the matter actually further discredits their erroneous teaching. We need to look at the meaning of the Greek term translated “to meet” that Christ inspired Paul to use in 1 Thessalonians 4:17. Dr. Leon Morris writes in the Tyndale New Testament Commentaries: “The expression translated to meet is kind of a technical term ‘for the official welcome of a newly arrived dignitary’…and is very suitable in this context.” Notice that it pertains to a newly arrived dignitary, not to one who is merely passing through. In no way does it convey that Christ only enters the atmosphere and then reverses cou
Read more

UNDERSTANDING THE GIFT OF PROPHECY: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FORETELLING, FORTH-TELLING AND FORTUNE TELLING

-
Image
There is so much misunderstanding in the Church today regarding the gift of prophecy. Many people believe that prophecy only refers to telling something before it happens. However, even in the Old Testament, the messages of the prophets contained as much, if not more, about the present than they did about the future. In Hebrew, the word translated prophecy is based on the word stem nābā, which simply means “to speak by divine inspiration, either in prediction or simple discourse.”  “ Prophecies ” is transliterated (i.e. brought straight over from Greek to English) from the noun  prophēteia . It is made up of  pro , meaning “before, in time or position” and a form of the verb  phēmi , meaning “to tell.” The verb form of this word can refer  EITHER : Foretelling  (predicting or telling something before it happens). It seeks to predict the future. It predicts or reveals personalities, occurrences, circumstances that will happen. It also concerns the revelation of even
Read more

A CHRISTIAN DOES NOT NEED DELIVERANCE.

-
As a Christian, you need to first understand your position in the spiritual realm. That will tell you whether you need deliverance or not from any authority. Let's look at the following scriptures: (Ephesians 2:6 KJV) And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus: The above verse shows that you are seated with Christ Jesus in the heavenly places. Where exactly is Christ Jesus seated in these heavenly places. Look at other verses below: (Ephesians 1:20-21 KJV) Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places,  Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come. From the verses it can be deduced that a Christian is seated with Christ Jesus in heavenly places; at the right hand of God; far above all principality, and power, and might, an
Read more

YOU CANNOT PRAY TO JESUS IN THE NAME OF JESUS

-
It does not have any spiritual meaning. This could be why most prayers are not answered. You cannot ask or pray to Jesus in the name of Jesus. Stop praying such prayers: "Jesus I come to you in the name of Jesus" You can only pray to the Father in the name of Jesus. What does it mean to pray in the name of Jesus? Praying in Jesus' name means praying with His authority. It is making a demand in His stead (place); as if He is the one making it. Authority means delegated power. You cannot exercise an authority on the same person that gave it to you. Look at it this way, you cannot go to the President of your country to make a demand in the name of that President rather you can go to another President in the name of your own President. Jesus said pray to the Father in His name: John 16:24 Hitherto have ye asked nothing in my name: ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full. Verse 26 & 27 At that day ye shall ask in my name: and I say not
Read more

DID JESUS ASCEND TO HEAVEN TWICE?

-
Image
The question of Jesus ascending twice to heaven is not often asked because there is this general acceptance of only one ascension of Jesus which occurred in Acts 1:9, Mark 16:19 and Luke 24:51 (Acts 1:9 KJV) And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight. (Mark 16:19 KJV) So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God. (Luke 24:51 KJV) And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven. However, there is an evidence in the Bible that He had earlier ascended to His Father in Heaven prior to this final ascension in the above verses.  Before His death, Jesus specifically told His disciples in the book of John chapter 16 that He would be going to His Father (which is in Heaven). (John 16:16-17 KJV) A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me, because I go to the Father.
Read more

IS THE BIBLE THE WORD OF GOD?

-
Image
The Bible is not the Word of God, Jesus is. Talking about Jesus in John 1:1 & 14, the Bible referred him as the Word of God:  (John 1:1 KJV)  In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  (John 1:14 KJV) And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.  The Bible however contains the Word of God. Notice that the Bible in addition to containing the Word of God has other words that were not from God. It is therefore more appropriate to say that the Bible contains the Word of God. 
Read more